INJ-00035 — tank_stratification

Status: EXPIRED · Category: A · Source: auto Fired at: 131.85 h · Duration: 6.0 h · Target: NE-01 Economic impact: $-2,000 /h

Parameters

{
  "product": "LIN",
  "error_pct": 15,
  "plant_id": "NE-01",
  "customer_id": "C-20",
  "truck_id": "T-E06",
  "driver_id": "D-E06"
}

Cascade — 10 agent steps

#stepagentdetail
1INJECTIONInjection Enginetank_stratification: LIN tank insulation failure. Perlite degradation → heat ingress → thermal stratification. Boiloff rate 3x normal.
2MPC_SOLVEMPC Optimizer📐 MPC: Optimal load 63% (4h horizon) | Priority: 3 | Expected margin: $0/h | Reason: All constraints healthy → optimize revenue (+load)
3PHYSICSPhysics KernelWarm layer forms at top of cryogenic liquid. Temperature gradient destabilizes tank. Boiloff 3x normal (~180 g/s). Level sensor may read 15% high due to density variation in stratified liquid.
4PRODUCTIONProduction AgentHOLD load at 60% — no load change needed. Production continues normally. The issue is tank insulation, not production equipment.
5TANKSTank Inventory AgentLIN at 61% (reported). ACTUAL level may be 46% due to stratification sensor error. Increased boiloff drains tank ~3x faster. Time to critical: ~77h.
6DISPATCHDispatch AgentNo immediate dispatch change. Monitor actual tank level via independent level measurement (radar vs differential pressure). If actual level is lower than displayed, accelerate dispatch.
7CUSTOMERSCustomer Impact AgentRisk: if tank level is actually 15% lower than reported, customer supply may be shorter than planned. Conservative dispatch planning recommended — assume worst-case level.
8LOSS_MITIGATIONLoss Ledger📉 L1: Primary Production Physical Balance — SENS detects level/density mismatch, flags rollover risk
9ECONOMICSEconomics AgentBoiloff loss 3x normal: ~15-50k depending on extent. Repair during next turnaround to avoid production loss.
10RECOVERYRecovery Planner1) Independent level check (radar gauge vs dP). 2) If stratification confirmed: gentle agitation via recirculation. 3) Insulation survey: IR thermography to find heat ingress path. 4) Re-vac of perlite annulus (schedu…

Raw effects

  1. LIN insulation failure — boiloff 3x, heat ingress to all tanks
  2. tank_stratification: LIN tank insulation failure. Perlite degradation → heat ingress → thermal stratification. Boiloff rate 3x normal.
  3. 📐 MPC: Optimal load 63% (4h horizon) | Priority: 3 | Expected margin: $0/h | Reason: All constraints healthy → optimize revenue (+load)
  4. Warm layer forms at top of cryogenic liquid. Temperature gradient destabilizes tank. Boiloff 3x normal (~180 g/s). Level sensor may read 15% high due to density variation in stratified liquid.
  5. HOLD load at 60% — no load change needed. Production continues normally. The issue is tank insulation, not production equipment.
  6. LIN at 61% (reported). ACTUAL level may be 46% due to stratification sensor error. Increased boiloff drains tank ~3x faster. Time to critical: ~77h.
  7. No immediate dispatch change. Monitor actual tank level via independent level measurement (radar vs differential pressure). If actual level is lower than displayed, accelerate dispatch.
  8. Risk: if tank level is actually 15% lower than reported, customer supply may be shorter than planned. Conservative dispatch planning recommended — assume worst-case level.
  9. 📉 L1: Primary Production Physical Balance — SENS detects level/density mismatch, flags rollover risk
  10. Boiloff loss 3x normal: ~15-50k depending on extent. Repair during next turnaround to avoid production loss.
    1. Independent level check (radar gauge vs dP). 2) If stratification confirmed: gentle agitation via recirculation. 3) Insulation survey: IR thermography to find heat ingress path. 4) Re-vac of perlite annulus (schedule during next turnaround, 48-72h).